Page 14 - NAMAH-Oct-2025
P. 14

Namah                                  Vol. 33, Issue 3, 15th October 2025





        warfare in the first Gulf War to name a few   and almost impose it, especially the scientific
        instances (7). Its promise was more as a “ghost   discoveries which have made our earth so small
        story”, “a spectral presence” than a reality.  that its vastest kingdoms seem now no more
        Nonetheless, twenty years and a Cold War   than the provinces of a single country (8).” I
        later, we come full circle to Fukuyama. We  do not mean to suggest that the “ideal” Sri
        can’t seem to help ourselves.            Aurobindo speaks of in this paragraph aligns
                                                 entirely with the work of Kant, Rawls and
                                                 others. Indeed, there are significant internal
                                                 differences between (and problems within)
                                                 the “liberal” commitments of these thinkers,
                                                 each of whom spoke in vastly different
                                                 contexts. I club them together at the risk of
                                                 caricature only to stress the common thread
                                                 of an underlying idealism committed (at least
                                                 formally) to a rule-governed, equal and free
                                                 society of nations.

        This aspiration to liberty, equality and  Is this persistent dream of a just and peaceful
        fraternity in the community of nations  global order a romantic fantasy? Or is it an
        finds expression in Sri Aurobindo’s, The  insistence on moral and spiritual resilience
        Ideal of Human Unity. Its persistence in our  sure to justify itself? In the current climate
        imagination, Sri Aurobindo argues, reflects  of 2025, the precarity of global affairs makes
        our spiritual nature. It is constantly beset  optimism difficult to justify. Consider the
        by the universal endowment of ignorance  cruel irony of the inhuman prosecution of
        and violence encoded in our egoism, yet it  the war in Gaza, courtesy the American veto
        remains ever-present behind the thick cloak  on the Security Council, the resurgence of
        of darkness and shines through in rare  Cold War dynamics and proxy battles in
        moments of idealism. It is as seductive in  Ukraine, the naked threat of American
        its appeal as it is difficult to realise. Modern  expansionism and economic coercion with
        conditions of globalisation, rationalism  the ongoing global tariff war, the fragile state
        and science, in particular, have pushed the  of the Chinese-American conflict, deepening
        allure of this ideal to the fore. Writing in the  cracks in NATO and internal fissures within
        Arya in the heat of the First World War, Sri  the European Union, the concurrent rise of
        Aurobindo noted that “… today the ideal of  nationalism and populism, the inability of
        human unity is more or less vaguely making  the international community to collaborate
        its way to the front of our consciousness.” This  on climate change and much more.
        ideal, he went on to say, “… having once made
        its way to the front of thought, must certainly
        be attempted, and this ideal of human unity is
        likely to figure largely among the determining
        forces of the future; for the intellectual and
        material circumstances of the age have prepared


        14
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19