Page 42 - NAMAH Oct 2015
P. 42
Namah Vol. 23, Issue 3, 15th October 2015
80% to 100%. from northern California who attended the
centres and 23 who resided in Auroville. All
Viewed overall, the above test re-test results subjects were tested before and again after
based on the three criteria served to verify the the initial IBEF induction. Centre subjects
completion of the reset. were tested directly with PDM, while QRT
was employed for the Auroville subjects
VIFI (each time stating the subject's name). The
procedure was done twice: 1) for existing
As explained in Part 2, (VIFI enables the allergy or related disorder reactivity/
practitioner to transfer/transmit healing sensitivity; and 2) for preventive allergy/
energy from an IBEF centre to a recipient. The disorder reactivity. Each time, four steps
VIFI letters stand for the four steps of the were applied as follows:
procedure:
a. Centre subjects were PDM-tested directly,
1. Visioning a certain IBEF centre or a location while holding the IBEF vial. Auroville
within Auroville; subjects were (distant) QRT-tested, stating
the name of each subject with the investigator
2. IBEF: saying “IBEF” aloud 5 times to holding the IBEF vial on behalf of the subject.
engender its healing energy;
b. If no reactivity (weakness) was detected,
3. Focus: on standing or sitting at a specific the investigator added an 'Amplifier 1' vial
place within the centre or within Auroville; for more sensitive testing; if still no reactivity,
he added an 'Amplifier 3' vial and re-tested.
4. Identify: the recipient by name who is to The Amplifier. Vials had been electronically
receive the IBEF healing. coded to enhance/amplify the testing to be
used together with a regular vial, while
Example testing for allergic reactivity/sensitivity.
There are five Amplifier vials; the investigator
Chris, a 21-year-old man, was shown by ascertained that, based on QRT, optimum
QRT-testing to be allergic to sugar without results would be produced with Amplifiers
obvious symptoms. Thereafter, his allergic 1 and 3.
reaction was addressed and cleared with VIFI
by the investigator's assistant, Jasmin, who c. If still no reactivity, he added a homoeo-
had been trained to apply the procedure. The pathic Epiphysis vial for even more sensitive
investigator then re-tested Chris, using both re-testing.
QRT and PDM; he found that the sugar
allergy was cleared, verifying that VIFI had
been effective.
A more detailed example is given by case Upon applying the above procedure, every
report 5 in Appendix 1. subject was found to have a degree of allergic
reaction/sensitivity to one or more substances
Pre-post testing or related disorders. In other words, the pre-
The study was comprised of 54 subjects: 31 tests revealed allergic or disorder reactivity
42
