Page 25 - NAMAH-Jan-2024
P. 25

Namah                   Sri Aurobindo’s Comments on Western Psychology





        Agni, have their two extremities hidden in a  noble, magnificent, something which the
        secrecy, and we should by this way only have  mind in man can do as it can escape from
        hold of the tail-end: the head would still be   ”the restrictions of the vital and physical
        mystic and secret. To know more we must   formula of being (15).”
        have studied not only the actual or possible
        action of body and matter on mind and life, but  In the late 1940s, Sri Aurobindo gave a classic
        explored all the possible action of mind too on  statement on psychophysiology (which he
        life and body; that opens undreamed vistas.  referred to as mixing of psychology and
        And there is always the vast field of the action  physiology), describing it as an “extended
        of mind in itself and on itself, which needs for   physiological”, not a “true psychological
        its elucidation another, a mental, a psychic   knowledge (16).” He explained that
        science (11).”                           whatever psychophysiology revealed was
                                                 not unexpected since we are a consciousness
        At a time when behaviourism was in its hey-  embodied and not disincarnate, acting
        day, Sri Aurobindo had quipped (sometime  through a body and therefore conditioned
        between 1940-42),”….sense and reflex action  by the body. “The truth of things can only
        becomes absurd if we try to explain by it   be perceived when one gets to what may be
        thought and will (12).” He had remarked in  called summarily the spiritual vision of things
        1925, “The difficulty is that they want to work   and even there completely only when there
        in psychology in the same way that they work   is not only vision but direct experience in the
        in physics. But psychology is not so simple. You   very substance of one’s own being and all
        can’t generalise in it as you can with matter. It   being (17).” He advocated that not psycho-
        is very subtle, and one has to take into account  physiological knowledge per se but “a
        many factors (13).”                      psycho-physical knowledge with a spiritual
                                                 foundation (18)”, would be more meaningful
        Comments on Psychophysiology             to understand human nature.


        Sri Aurobindo had been commenting on the  Comments on Altered States of Consciousness
        skewed views resulting from the mixing of
        psychology and physiology since 1916. In The  Altered states of consciousness have become
        Synthesis of Yoga (serialised between 1914-21),  important sources for research in transpersonal
        he pointed out that a psychophysiological  psychology and in body-mind interactions. As
        perspective that considers the biological  early as in 1915, Sri Aurobindo had written:
        and physiological factors of our nature as
        the sole foundation of psychology could  “Modern psychological experiment and obser-
        explain only, ”... the animal side of human   vation have proceeded on two different lines
        nature and of the human mind in so far as it   which have not yet found their point of meeting.
        is limited and conditioned by the physical part   On the one hand, psychology has taken for its
        of our being (14).” This would not suffice to   starting-point the discoveries and fundamental
        explain human nature because the animal   thesis of the physical sciences and has worked
        mind cannot even for a moment delink itself   as a continuation of physiology(19).” “The
        from its origins and  become great, free,  other line of psychological investigation is


                                                                                     25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30