Page 44 - NAMAH-Apr-2020
P. 44

Forgiveness and reconciliation



        Denis Capdeville


        Abstract
        This article looks at the ontological nature of a thought as a concrete object, though on a subtle
        level. Thinking consistently over the same topic is nourishing a unique thought, which is
        empowered and thus becomes autonomous. Whenever it is a thought of worry towards another, it
        hypnotises us in return, preventing us to forgive. Once one is under the power of such a thought,
        forgetting becomes nearly impossible. To overcome this pattern of non-forgiveness, one should
        acknowledge this occult reality of nature and power of a thought. Afterwards, one should shift
        this morbid tendency to obey to this thought, that was initially created, to the pioneering way to
        let it go. Some tools may help us in this innovative behaviour.




        Carrying versus letting go               The first monk looks surprised and asks, “What
                                                 are you talking about, what is prohibited?”
        You may know this story of the two monks  “Have you forgotten everything?”, asks the
        and the woman. While preparing to cross the  second monk. “You carried this woman on
        river, two Zen monks meet a woman who  your shoulders!” The first monk laughs and
        also wants to cross but who is afraid. One  replies: “Yes, I carried her. But I left her by
        of the monks takes her on his shoulders and  the river, miles and miles back. But you, you
        carries her to the other side. The other says  are still carrying her!”
        nothing but is furious inside because what
        the monk has done is forbidden! A monk  Thoughts are objects on a subtle level, and
        must not touch a woman. And not only did  carrying a thought is similar to carrying
        he touch her, but he also carried her on his  a physical item. It may become heavy,
        shoulders. After many kilometres, they reach  burdening and prevent us from moving easily
        the monastery. Going through the door, the  and comfortably. Carrying something for
        angry monk turns to his companion and  long, be it a thought or an object, is not the
        says to him: “Well, I’m going to have to tell  usual and free way we should be moving
        the Master about this matter to let him know  through life. We may have to carry something
        what you did because what you have done is  from time to time, from place to place, but
        forbidden.”                              it should only be for a given purpose, for a

        44
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49