Page 26 - NAMAH-Apr-2020
P. 26

Namah                                    Vol. 28, Issue 1, 24th April 2020





        how he differentiated cases needing occult  paradigms if we consider the yogic insight
        intervention and herbal remedies from those  that the macrocosm is represented in the
        who had to be treated not by him but by a  microcosm and the microcosm is represented
        modern psychiatric practitioner, who would  in the macrocosm.  In other words, this is
        prescribe psychotropic medication.   He also  meant to imply that a higher level of Reality
        clarified that even in cases treated by him,  can be represented at a lower level of reality.
        some needed concurrent pharmacological  The mystic and the spiritual seeker deal
        treatment, too, for which he also made referrals.  with the higher level of Reality, while the
        When asked if as a mystic, he had any  scientist and the materialist deal with the
        reservations about taking help from modern  earthly reality implying a duality implicit in
        psychiatry, he gave a beautiful answer — “Let  reality itself. Sri Aurobindo explained that
        saadhanaa (spiritual pursuit) and gavesana (scientific  this duality is not infallible and is not a “law
        research) go together — where is the conflict?”  of manifestation”; rather it is “a circumstance”
                                                 of evolution. Duality is just “the device of
        Clearly this remarkable mystic has an    manifesting the Infinite in Ignorance through
        integrated approach to treatment.  For the   imperfect instruments (3)”.
        field of psychology, the question remains
        unanswered: how can the two perspectives,  In a reverse movement, the imperfect
        the spiritual and the scientific, be optimally  instruments can also be transformed into
        combined? An initial exploration of these  perfected archetypes not merely in the world
        issues is documented by the anthropologist  of ideals but in the realm of manifestation.
        mentioned above, Natalie Tobert, who has  In his magnum opus, The Life Divine, he has
        written a fascinating book on her study of  described how the earthly reality can be
        traditional healers, patients and modern  transfigured in transcendental terms through
        psychiatrists in India, Spiritual Psychiatries (2).  an elaborate and sophisticated process of what
                                                 he terms as supramental transformation.  In
        The relation between the spiritual and  other words, the higher Reality can manifest
        scientific paradigms                     at the earthly level, too.  Actually, it is not
                                                 a question of two different realities but the
        The spiritual and mechanistic paradigms of  same Reality that is manifested at different
        consciousness are so far removed from each  levels for “The Reality is one and not a sum or
        other that it would be relevant to ponder  a concourse (4)”.
        whether it is worthwhile to forcibly reduce
        one in terms of the other. Instead, perhaps  Sri Aurobindo qualified that, Reality or Brahman
        it would be more meaningful to keep the  expresses Itself in “many successive forms of
        two paradigms separate for conceptual,  consciousness, successive in their relation even
        theoretical, practical and heuristic reasons. If  if co-existent in being or coeval in Time (5).”
        a link could be established between the two  Further, “Brahman is integral and unifies many
        paradigms, then our whole perspective of   states of consciousness at a time (6).”
        consciousness research would change.
                                                 This stance helps to consider an overview
        A link can actually be made between the two  of consciousness where both the synthetic


        26
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31